Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22681 - 22690 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 22681 - 22690 of 58492 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
).[2] We therefore affirm the trial court’s order denying Nisiewicz’s motion. ¶2 Nisiewicz pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59174 - 2011-01-24
).[2] We therefore affirm the trial court’s order denying Nisiewicz’s motion. ¶2 Nisiewicz pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59174 - 2011-01-24
COURT OF APPEALS
a trial court may consider all reliable information when sentencing, we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30481 - 2007-10-02
a trial court may consider all reliable information when sentencing, we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30481 - 2007-10-02
[PDF]
State v. Phillip C.P.
that the trial court misapplied § 767.32(2m), STATS., by failing to make the requisite finding of unfairness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12832 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court misapplied § 767.32(2m), STATS., by failing to make the requisite finding of unfairness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12832 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
postcommitment motion for a new trial. He argues: (1) allowing the jury to hear comments made at a sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84133 - 2012-07-02
postcommitment motion for a new trial. He argues: (1) allowing the jury to hear comments made at a sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84133 - 2012-07-02
State v. Elaine Veasley
of possession of drug paraphernalia, contrary to § 161.573, Stats. She claims the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8636 - 2005-03-31
of possession of drug paraphernalia, contrary to § 161.573, Stats. She claims the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8636 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Otis J. Braxton
-defense. However, because the trial court reasonably determined the facts adduced at trial could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15302 - 2017-09-21
-defense. However, because the trial court reasonably determined the facts adduced at trial could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15302 - 2017-09-21
State v. Fred V. Vogelsberg
CURIAM. The State of Wisconsin appeals the trial court’s suppression order in its pending felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19852 - 2005-10-05
CURIAM. The State of Wisconsin appeals the trial court’s suppression order in its pending felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19852 - 2005-10-05
[PDF]
State v. Carlton S. C.-B.
issue for review— whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress physical evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9526 - 2017-09-19
issue for review— whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress physical evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9526 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gary Klatt
. Klatt argues that (1) the trial court erroneously calculated his presentence incarceration credit; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11353 - 2005-03-31
. Klatt argues that (1) the trial court erroneously calculated his presentence incarceration credit; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11353 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cory Gilmore
(2003-04) 1 motion. Gilmore claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25907 - 2017-09-21
(2003-04) 1 motion. Gilmore claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25907 - 2017-09-21