Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22691 - 22700 of 29810 for des.
Search results 22691 - 22700 of 29810 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
. “The interpretation and application of statutes are questions of law that we review de novo.” Christensen v. Sullivan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40933 - 2009-09-14
. “The interpretation and application of statutes are questions of law that we review de novo.” Christensen v. Sullivan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40933 - 2009-09-14
[PDF]
Ronald M. Hubbard v. Peot Construction, Inc.
reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16177 - 2017-09-21
reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16177 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. Second, based on the historical facts, we review de novo whether” the facts meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158229 - 2017-09-21
they are clearly erroneous. Second, based on the historical facts, we review de novo whether” the facts meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158229 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are subject to de novo review. Jackson Cty. v. Susan H., 2010 WI App 82, ¶10, 326 Wis. 2d 246, 785 N.W. 677
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198730 - 2017-10-26
are subject to de novo review. Jackson Cty. v. Susan H., 2010 WI App 82, ¶10, 326 Wis. 2d 246, 785 N.W. 677
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198730 - 2017-10-26
[PDF]
State v. Roger P. Barber
facts’ which this court may review de novo.” Id. The constitutional right to present evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13448 - 2017-09-21
facts’ which this court may review de novo.” Id. The constitutional right to present evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13448 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 117
not make a sufficient showing on one, see Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697, and we decide de novo the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102930 - 2017-09-21
not make a sufficient showing on one, see Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697, and we decide de novo the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102930 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both components
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234705 - 2019-02-12
a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both components
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234705 - 2019-02-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See Estate of Riley ex rel. Riley v. Ford Motor Co., 2001 WI App 234
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215635 - 2018-07-17
is a question of law we review de novo. See Estate of Riley ex rel. Riley v. Ford Motor Co., 2001 WI App 234
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215635 - 2018-07-17
[PDF]
State v. James A. Genett
. However, we review de novo the determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12618 - 2017-09-21
. However, we review de novo the determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12618 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 189
. Kieffer, 217 Wis. 2d 531, 541, 577 N.W.2d 352 (1998). We decide constitutional questions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29289 - 2014-09-15
. Kieffer, 217 Wis. 2d 531, 541, 577 N.W.2d 352 (1998). We decide constitutional questions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29289 - 2014-09-15