Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22691 - 22700 of 29713 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of [WIS. STAT.] § 51.35 present questions of law that we review de novo.” Samuel J.H., 349 Wis. 2d 202
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=404649 - 2021-08-05

[PDF] WI APP 88
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. State v. Hughes, 218 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63758 - 2014-09-15

State v. Donavan D. Theno
)). Whether counsel’s performance prejudiced the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16027 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Michael Yauger v. Skiing Enterprises, Inc.
is a question of law which we review de novo. Eder v. Lake Geneva Raceway, 187 Wis. 2d 596, 610, 523 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16954 - 2017-09-21

Adrian Laurich v. Jon Litscher
a claim for relief. These are all questions of law, which we review de novo. When deciding whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5676 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
statute to a given set of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶13. ¶8 Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66888 - 2014-09-15

State v. Frank Miles
of a statute presents an issue of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Wilson, 170 Wis.2d 720, 722, 490
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12468 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
Sosnay, 209 Wis. 2d 241, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law on a de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29263 - 2007-05-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Conserve summary judgment. Culver now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review a summary judgment ruling de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56840 - 2010-11-15

[PDF] State v. Michael A. DeLain
ineffective is a question of law we review de novo. Id. DeLain has not contested any material findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6469 - 2017-09-19