Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2271 - 2280 of 5225 for ey.

CA Blank Order
glassy, watery, bloodshot eyes. The officer said that he did not conduct field sobriety tests because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99748 - 2013-07-18

Carl Rucker v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
; and (3) that default judgments are regarded with disfavor in the eyes of the law. The prompt action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2861 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of supervision, for involvement in an offense that left the victim with the loss of an eye and a bullet lodged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91473 - 2013-01-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
their eyes to means of information readily accessible to ascertain the facts. Kanack v. Kremski, 96 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77158 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Kimberly K. Hawkes v. Michael M. Bagain
on a bartender’s head, struck her eye. There is little dispute over the sequence of events leading up to Hawkes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6292 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] County of Jefferson v. James A. Lenz
of intoxication, including bloodshot and glassy eyes, slurred speech, and a strong odor of intoxicants, both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15544 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jerome P. Wiechert
weeks before Mina’s hospitalization, Julia noticed a red mark above Mina’s eye after Wiechert had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11349 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
) to sit still and keep his eyes close. Because of Kedinger’s behavior, the facility would not schedule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58204 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
slurred speech, no red and/or watery eyes, no slow movements, no mental confusion or otherwise suspicious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49237 - 2010-04-27

State v. Jerome P. Wiechert
noticed a red mark above Mina’s eye after Wiechert had bathed Mina. It is for the jury, not this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11349 - 2013-05-06