Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2271 - 2280 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 2271 - 2280 of 58458 for speedy trial.
State v. Levelt D. Musgraves
. FINE, J. Levelt D. Musgraves appeals from a judgment convicting him, after a jury trial, of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9121 - 2005-03-31
. FINE, J. Levelt D. Musgraves appeals from a judgment convicting him, after a jury trial, of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9121 - 2005-03-31
Michael A. Stauffacher v. Douglas E. Stoneman
appeals from the trial court order entering judgment against him for $5,828.35, following a bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10712 - 2005-03-31
appeals from the trial court order entering judgment against him for $5,828.35, following a bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10712 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Levelt D. Musgraves
. Musgraves appeals from a judgment convicting him, after a jury trial, of first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9121 - 2017-09-19
. Musgraves appeals from a judgment convicting him, after a jury trial, of first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9121 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Earls argues that the trial court improperly determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138827 - 2015-04-07
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Earls argues that the trial court improperly determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138827 - 2015-04-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court improperly determined that by failing to No. 2014AP57-CR 2 diligently procure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138827 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court improperly determined that by failing to No. 2014AP57-CR 2 diligently procure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138827 - 2017-09-21
Bruce Gebhart v. Green Lake County
removing or destroying trees as part of a highway improvement project. The trial court dismissed two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26557 - 2006-09-26
removing or destroying trees as part of a highway improvement project. The trial court dismissed two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26557 - 2006-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS
-02),[1] and from the order denying his postconviction motion. Garro complains that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105891 - 2013-12-26
-02),[1] and from the order denying his postconviction motion. Garro complains that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105891 - 2013-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion. Garro complains that the trial court improperly denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105891 - 2017-09-21
denying his postconviction motion. Garro complains that the trial court improperly denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105891 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Bruce Gebhart v. Green Lake County
the County from removing or destroying trees as part of a highway improvement project. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26557 - 2017-09-21
the County from removing or destroying trees as part of a highway improvement project. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26557 - 2017-09-21
State v. Donald Edward Weston
for relief. Weston raises four issues for review: (1) whether he was denied effective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10654 - 2005-03-31
for relief. Weston raises four issues for review: (1) whether he was denied effective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10654 - 2005-03-31