Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22701 - 22710 of 64166 for records.
Search results 22701 - 22710 of 64166 for records.
State v. Antonio Jones
, 547 N.W.2d 806, 809 (Ct. App. 1996). The record must show that the trial court exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14343 - 2005-03-31
, 547 N.W.2d 806, 809 (Ct. App. 1996). The record must show that the trial court exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14343 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Walter L. Merten v. Department of Transportation
not reverse a trial court’s discretionary act if the record reflects a reasonable basis for the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2723 - 2017-09-19
not reverse a trial court’s discretionary act if the record reflects a reasonable basis for the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2723 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Although that presumption does not automatically validate Miller’s sentence, the record reflects a proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114604 - 2014-06-16
Although that presumption does not automatically validate Miller’s sentence, the record reflects a proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114604 - 2014-06-16
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132252 - 2014-12-29
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132252 - 2014-12-29
CA Blank Order
given by the victim to police. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114318 - 2014-06-09
given by the victim to police. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114318 - 2014-06-09
Barry L. Ball v. Matthew Frank
OF REVIEW ¶5 Our certiorari review is limited to the record created before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21513 - 2006-02-22
OF REVIEW ¶5 Our certiorari review is limited to the record created before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21513 - 2006-02-22
State v. Jewel C.
-correcting court” and reviews the record to address any alleged “errors” of the trial court. Cook v. Cook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4094 - 2005-03-31
-correcting court” and reviews the record to address any alleged “errors” of the trial court. Cook v. Cook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4094 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Edward Pryzina v. City of Thorp
, the trial court affirmed based on the record of the administrative proceeding. Pryzina has waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10079 - 2017-09-19
, the trial court affirmed based on the record of the administrative proceeding. Pryzina has waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10079 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239882 - 2019-04-25
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239882 - 2019-04-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP709-CRNM 2 not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585956 - 2022-11-08
. No. 2020AP709-CRNM 2 not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585956 - 2022-11-08