Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22701 - 22710 of 38464 for t's.
Search results 22701 - 22710 of 38464 for t's.
COURT OF APPEALS
of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To prove prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46286 - 2010-01-26
of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To prove prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46286 - 2010-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 4, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253260 - 2020-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 4, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253260 - 2020-02-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he said leave me alone, take me to jail. … [T]hat to me seems pretty unambiguous. Leave me alone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194020 - 2017-09-21
that he said leave me alone, take me to jail. … [T]hat to me seems pretty unambiguous. Leave me alone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194020 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to “continue the status quo” was inadequate because [t]he only other order on placement, custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887645 - 2024-12-10
to “continue the status quo” was inadequate because [t]he only other order on placement, custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887645 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. FILED JUN 15, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Supreme Court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533619 - 2022-06-15
, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. FILED JUN 15, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Supreme Court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533619 - 2022-06-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is to supply a factual basis for the plea as is frequently the case. See id. However, “[i]t is not necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94617 - 2013-03-27
is to supply a factual basis for the plea as is frequently the case. See id. However, “[i]t is not necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94617 - 2013-03-27
State v. David L. Harmon
)(h), in support of his argument. Section 971.04(1) provides, in relevant part: [T]he defendant shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15100 - 2005-03-31
)(h), in support of his argument. Section 971.04(1) provides, in relevant part: [T]he defendant shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15100 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of my ignorance. I wasn’t even violating the statu[t]e … by just showing indifference to Niki’s age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59324 - 2014-09-15
of my ignorance. I wasn’t even violating the statu[t]e … by just showing indifference to Niki’s age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59324 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[i]t was difficult to access those services in terms of psychological evaluations, participating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69467 - 2014-09-15
that “[i]t was difficult to access those services in terms of psychological evaluations, participating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69467 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 103
therefore concludes that “§ 980.09 provides a procedure different from summary judgment” and “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52593 - 2014-09-15
therefore concludes that “§ 980.09 provides a procedure different from summary judgment” and “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52593 - 2014-09-15