Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22711 - 22720 of 83322 for case search.
Search results 22711 - 22720 of 83322 for case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the obstructing charge in this case. The court denied the motion without a hearing, noting that the obstructing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069223 - 2026-01-29
on the obstructing charge in this case. The court denied the motion without a hearing, noting that the obstructing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069223 - 2026-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
. Huss argues the circuit court erred in both cases by rejecting his collateral attack on three of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100149 - 2013-07-29
. Huss argues the circuit court erred in both cases by rejecting his collateral attack on three of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100149 - 2013-07-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
over this case in the circuit court. In the same order, the circuit court also denied Caraballo’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=945829 - 2025-04-24
over this case in the circuit court. In the same order, the circuit court also denied Caraballo’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=945829 - 2025-04-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the State failed to prove that one of the alleged prior offenses, a 2001 State of Oregon case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248781 - 2019-10-17
that the State failed to prove that one of the alleged prior offenses, a 2001 State of Oregon case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248781 - 2019-10-17
[PDF]
Jim Mattson v. Thomas O. Schultz
these arguments and affirm the judgment. Schultz represented Jim Mattson in an age discrimination case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9817 - 2017-09-19
these arguments and affirm the judgment. Schultz represented Jim Mattson in an age discrimination case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9817 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066767 - 2026-01-23
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066767 - 2026-01-23
[PDF]
State v. Peter R. Burgeson
court was advised that Burgeson would probably plead guilty, but that he had a pending case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13136 - 2017-09-21
court was advised that Burgeson would probably plead guilty, but that he had a pending case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13136 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638833 - 2023-03-29
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638833 - 2023-03-29
[PDF]
Michael G. Plourde v. Jeffrey W. Guettinger
case. On appeal, the Plourdes argue that the trial court misconstrued the mortgage foreclosure case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12579 - 2017-09-21
case. On appeal, the Plourdes argue that the trial court misconstrued the mortgage foreclosure case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12579 - 2017-09-21
State v. Peter R. Burgeson
case in Waukesha County that he wanted to know the outcome of before proceeding with the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
case in Waukesha County that he wanted to know the outcome of before proceeding with the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31