Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22711 - 22720 of 29713 for des.
Search results 22711 - 22720 of 29713 for des.
State v. Edward Garrett
, is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3307 - 2005-03-31
, is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3307 - 2005-03-31
WI app 117 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2049-CR Complete Titl...
if the defendant does not make a sufficient showing on one, see Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697, and we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102930 - 2013-10-29
if the defendant does not make a sufficient showing on one, see Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697, and we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102930 - 2013-10-29
State v. Scott Heimermann
reviewing “[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8548 - 2005-03-31
reviewing “[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8548 - 2005-03-31
Jennifer L. Weston v. Matthew J. B.
the correct legal standard is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Gallagher v. Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20999 - 2006-01-18
the correct legal standard is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Gallagher v. Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20999 - 2006-01-18
[PDF]
MR v. Jason Turcott
. ANALYSIS ¶5 We review an order for summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7216 - 2017-09-20
. ANALYSIS ¶5 We review an order for summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7216 - 2017-09-20
Norman C. Danielson v. City of Sun Prairie
de novo. See Cemetery Servs., Inc. v. Department of Regulation and Licensing, 221 Wis. 2d 817, 823
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16121 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See Cemetery Servs., Inc. v. Department of Regulation and Licensing, 221 Wis. 2d 817, 823
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16121 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael J. Forster
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pablo R., 2000 WI App 242, ¶7, 239 Wis. 2d 479, 620 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5005 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pablo R., 2000 WI App 242, ¶7, 239 Wis. 2d 479, 620 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5005 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the County satisfied its burden de novo. Melanie L., 349 Wis. 2d 148, ¶¶38-39. ¶23 This is, in my view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913011 - 2025-02-13
the County satisfied its burden de novo. Melanie L., 349 Wis. 2d 148, ¶¶38-39. ¶23 This is, in my view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913011 - 2025-02-13
[PDF]
State v. Luis R. Davila-Diaz
] or [Davila-Diaz] tell you why they had to kill Carmen Hernandez and Juan De[L]ossantos? A. They were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6511 - 2017-09-19
] or [Davila-Diaz] tell you why they had to kill Carmen Hernandez and Juan De[L]ossantos? A. They were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6511 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This determination is a question of law that we review de novo. Watkins, 398 Wis. 2d 558, ¶44, 961 N.W.2d 884
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489199 - 2022-03-01
. This determination is a question of law that we review de novo. Watkins, 398 Wis. 2d 558, ¶44, 961 N.W.2d 884
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489199 - 2022-03-01