Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22711 - 22720 of 57351 for id.
Search results 22711 - 22720 of 57351 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and accepted meaning. Id., ¶16. In addition, “statutory language is interpreted in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=956605 - 2025-05-15
, and accepted meaning. Id., ¶16. In addition, “statutory language is interpreted in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=956605 - 2025-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
asked Riccobono if Clark “sa[id] anything in addition to that” and Riccobono stated that Clark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60276 - 2011-02-22
asked Riccobono if Clark “sa[id] anything in addition to that” and Riccobono stated that Clark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60276 - 2011-02-22
2010 WI APP 42
interpreting these clauses.” Id., 2007 WI 26, ¶13, 299 Wis. 2d at 278, 727 N.W.2d at 523–524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46522 - 2011-01-03
interpreting these clauses.” Id., 2007 WI 26, ¶13, 299 Wis. 2d at 278, 727 N.W.2d at 523–524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46522 - 2011-01-03
State v. Bernard G. Fearing
the legislative history of § 53.43 (1973) and policy arguments.[6] See id. at 113-14. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16172 - 2005-03-31
the legislative history of § 53.43 (1973) and policy arguments.[6] See id. at 113-14. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16172 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, as “the trial court’s sentence is presumptively reasonable,” id., and there is a “consistent and strong [public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30845 - 2007-11-13
, as “the trial court’s sentence is presumptively reasonable,” id., and there is a “consistent and strong [public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30845 - 2007-11-13
[PDF]
State v. William L. Brunton
§ 974.06, STATS.6 Id. at 102, 325 N.W.2d at 690. Section 974.06(6) provides that proceedings under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8505 - 2017-09-19
§ 974.06, STATS.6 Id. at 102, 325 N.W.2d at 690. Section 974.06(6) provides that proceedings under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8505 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the record whether Therese understood she would be found unfit to parent as a result of her plea.” Id., ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212017 - 2018-05-01
on the record whether Therese understood she would be found unfit to parent as a result of her plea.” Id., ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212017 - 2018-05-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
should not have found guilt based on the evidence before it. Id.3 ¶13 This standard applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228640 - 2019-06-17
should not have found guilt based on the evidence before it. Id.3 ¶13 This standard applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228640 - 2019-06-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to relief. Id. (footnote omitted). ¶3 A postconviction motion must assert material facts in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106756 - 2017-09-21
to relief. Id. (footnote omitted). ¶3 A postconviction motion must assert material facts in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106756 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for misuse of discretion. Id., ¶13. “However, not all evidentiary rulings are discretionary. For example
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117594 - 2014-07-21
for misuse of discretion. Id., ¶13. “However, not all evidentiary rulings are discretionary. For example
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117594 - 2014-07-21