Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22711 - 22720 of 46056 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
,” at which time the deputy administered field sobriety tests. During a pat down, Gilles located baggies
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207120 - 2018-01-17

COURT OF APPEALS
. App. 1994). The test is whether there exists any rational basis to justify the classification. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52620 - 2010-07-27

State v. Christopher B. Cook
, and the bloodshot and glassy eyes, he asked Cook to perform field sobriety tests. Officer Pitt ultimately issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4351 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Patrick D. O'Donnell
is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court. See id. at 677, 298 N.W.2d at 204. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14878 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
-acts evidence is governed by a three-step test: the evidence must be admitted for an acceptable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042665 - 2025-11-26

[PDF] State v. James T. Fitzgerald
.2d 317 (1989). The test for submitting a lesser-included offense is whether “there are reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14965 - 2017-09-21

State v. Steven M. Zoromski
of the vitality of the “greater latitude” test found in a line of cases including State v. Fishnick, 127 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14323 - 2005-03-31

State v. Colleen Lemmer
.” (Emphasis added.) The question of what constitutes reasonableness is a commonsense test. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16046 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Colleen Lemmer
is a commonsense test. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 56, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). We inquire: “What
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16046 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). The test for deficient performance is whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157698 - 2017-09-21