Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22711 - 22720 of 58991 for quit claim deed.
Search results 22711 - 22720 of 58991 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
Rossa in small claims court alleging that Rossa was in possession of certain property belonging to them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107789 - 2014-02-05
Rossa in small claims court alleging that Rossa was in possession of certain property belonging to them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107789 - 2014-02-05
State v. Maurice D. Harris
was not needed. As for Harris’s claim that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5766 - 2005-03-31
was not needed. As for Harris’s claim that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5766 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph McGowan
inmate, appeals orders denying his claim for additional sentence credit. He asserts a right to 311 more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5667 - 2005-03-31
inmate, appeals orders denying his claim for additional sentence credit. He asserts a right to 311 more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5667 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maurice D. Harris
was not needed. As for Harris’s claim that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5765 - 2005-03-31
was not needed. As for Harris’s claim that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5765 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maurice D. Harris
was not needed. As for Harris’s claim that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5764 - 2005-03-31
was not needed. As for Harris’s claim that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5764 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Barry D. Stamps
weapon as a habitual offender. He claims that certain hearsay statements were admitted against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7256 - 2017-09-20
weapon as a habitual offender. He claims that certain hearsay statements were admitted against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7256 - 2017-09-20
Bernice B. Siebert v. Glenn H. Siebert
. Bernice also claimed that health problems affected her prospects. Taken together, this evidence tended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9795 - 2005-03-31
. Bernice also claimed that health problems affected her prospects. Taken together, this evidence tended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9795 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s judgment dismissing its action against Russell Gray. The issue is whether the Village’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30239 - 2007-09-12
court’s judgment dismissing its action against Russell Gray. The issue is whether the Village’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30239 - 2007-09-12
[PDF]
Stratford Area Fire Department v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that Krause’s claim for loss of earning capacity benefits was premature because, although Krause sustained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2475 - 2017-09-19
that Krause’s claim for loss of earning capacity benefits was premature because, although Krause sustained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2475 - 2017-09-19
State v. Patrick T. Roberts
. Id. Litigants claiming impermissibly disparate sentences have the burden of proving this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9606 - 2005-03-31
. Id. Litigants claiming impermissibly disparate sentences have the burden of proving this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9606 - 2005-03-31