Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22721 - 22730 of 29810 for des.
Search results 22721 - 22730 of 29810 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
decides de novo. Id. ¶13 Zarter contends that counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68300 - 2011-07-20
decides de novo. Id. ¶13 Zarter contends that counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68300 - 2011-07-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute to an undisputed set of facts,” which is a question of law subject to de novo review. Estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241840 - 2019-06-06
of a statute to an undisputed set of facts,” which is a question of law subject to de novo review. Estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241840 - 2019-06-06
Jason Ritzel v. Wausau Business Insurance Company
of a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Stipetich v. Grosshans, 2000 WI App 100, ¶10, 235
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3423 - 2005-03-31
of a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Stipetich v. Grosshans, 2000 WI App 100, ¶10, 235
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3423 - 2005-03-31
Walter G. Bohrer, Jr. v. City of Milwaukee
Interpretation and application of a statute to undisputed facts presents a question of law subject to our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3266 - 2005-03-31
Interpretation and application of a statute to undisputed facts presents a question of law subject to our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3266 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362766 - 2021-05-04
the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362766 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether a jury instruction correctly states the law. Id. “[W]e will not find error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616461 - 2023-01-31
review de novo whether a jury instruction correctly states the law. Id. “[W]e will not find error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616461 - 2023-01-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 972.11(1)). We review the trial court’s application of constitutional principles de novo. Casarez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147788 - 2017-09-21
. § 972.11(1)). We review the trial court’s application of constitutional principles de novo. Casarez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147788 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
provision to undisputed facts is a question of law and thus calls for de novo review. Steven G. v. Herget
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34030 - 2008-09-16
provision to undisputed facts is a question of law and thus calls for de novo review. Steven G. v. Herget
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34030 - 2008-09-16
Spic and Span, Inc. v. Northwestern National Insurance Company of Milwaukee
. Our review is de novo. See Park Bancorporation, Inc. v. Sletteland, 182 Wis.2d 131, 140, 513 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9353 - 2005-03-31
. Our review is de novo. See Park Bancorporation, Inc. v. Sletteland, 182 Wis.2d 131, 140, 513 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9353 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was negligent. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Bank of New York Mellon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888126 - 2024-12-12
was negligent. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Bank of New York Mellon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888126 - 2024-12-12