Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22741 - 22750 of 63968 for records/1000.
Search results 22741 - 22750 of 63968 for records/1000.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95445 - 2014-09-15
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95445 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102012 - 2017-09-21
reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102012 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the no-merit report and independently reviewing the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219536 - 2018-09-26
the no-merit report and independently reviewing the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219536 - 2018-09-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon my independent review of the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220259 - 2018-09-28
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon my independent review of the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220259 - 2018-09-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
a transcript of the court trial. Therefore, the record on appeal is limited to the facts set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39706 - 2014-09-15
a transcript of the court trial. Therefore, the record on appeal is limited to the facts set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39706 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082482 - 2026-02-24
. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082482 - 2026-02-24
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the no-merit report, and following an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913870 - 2025-02-12
of the no-merit report, and following an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913870 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
State v. Julie Dixon
the request for a stay pending appeal. There is no indication in the record that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13355 - 2017-09-21
the request for a stay pending appeal. There is no indication in the record that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13355 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
against it. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132050 - 2014-12-22
against it. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132050 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Nos. 2021AP2030-CRNM 2021AP2031-CRNM 2 record, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606134 - 2022-12-30
. Nos. 2021AP2030-CRNM 2021AP2031-CRNM 2 record, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606134 - 2022-12-30