Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22751 - 22760 of 29713 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are multiplicitous is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Brantner, 2020 WI 21, ¶8, 390 Wis. 2d 494
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586026 - 2022-11-08

[PDF] Lake City Corporation v. City of Mequon
of statutory construction which is a question of law that we review de novo. See DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8354 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 37. We review de novo whether the elements of judicial estoppel are present because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666381 - 2023-06-14

[PDF] State v. Darius K. Jennings
a motion alleges sufficient facts to entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14828 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 139
an issue is moot is a question of law we review de novo. State ex rel. Milwaukee Cnty. Pers. Review Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70462 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Janice M. Dunn v. Milwaukee County
analysis de novo, applying the same method employed by circuit courts. See Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7193 - 2017-09-20

Spic and Span, Inc. v. Northwestern National Insurance Company of Milwaukee
. Our review is de novo. See Park Bancorporation, Inc. v. Sletteland, 182 Wis.2d 131, 140, 513 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9165 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶14 A claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192264 - 2017-09-21

Tammy Turner v. Gene Dencker Buick-Pontiac, Inc.
in relation to a given set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Tahtinen v. MSI Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16274 - 2005-03-31

Daniel T. Mayer v. State of Wisconsin Department of Agriculture
and past practice should guide this court, it nevertheless concedes that the review is de novo. We give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3215 - 2005-03-31