Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22751 - 22760 of 63595 for records/1000.
Search results 22751 - 22760 of 63595 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124672 - 2017-09-21
erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124672 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dean C. Trepanier
” and “significant criminal record aside from [OWI- 5 th ].” The court continued: In terms of his treatment, you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26060 - 2017-09-21
” and “significant criminal record aside from [OWI- 5 th ].” The court continued: In terms of his treatment, you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26060 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the no-merit report and independently reviewing the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219536 - 2018-09-26
the no-merit report and independently reviewing the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219536 - 2018-09-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, I agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207536 - 2018-01-23
review of the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, I agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207536 - 2018-01-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Matthew Skamfer appeals a postconviction order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161748 - 2017-09-21
. Matthew Skamfer appeals a postconviction order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161748 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230711 - 2018-12-18
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230711 - 2018-12-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264839 - 2020-06-23
. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264839 - 2020-06-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report, as mandated by Anders. We conclude that, subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631409 - 2023-03-14
independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report, as mandated by Anders. We conclude that, subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631409 - 2023-03-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of record and therefore, there are no arguably meritorious issues. As to the involuntary administration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180087 - 2017-09-21
of record and therefore, there are no arguably meritorious issues. As to the involuntary administration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180087 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. No. 2018AP2118-CRNM 2 Upon our independent review of the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252560 - 2020-01-16
a response. No. 2018AP2118-CRNM 2 Upon our independent review of the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252560 - 2020-01-16