Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22761 - 22770 of 98574 for civil court case status online.
Search results 22761 - 22770 of 98574 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case, the circuit court repeatedly referenced Whitaker’s childhood Amish community and stated its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=703564 - 2023-09-19
case, the circuit court repeatedly referenced Whitaker’s childhood Amish community and stated its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=703564 - 2023-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 8, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162808 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 8, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162808 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 14, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269016 - 2020-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 14, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269016 - 2020-07-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
if the circuit court allows the defendant to amend the answer. In that case, our supreme court explains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219082 - 2019-01-29
if the circuit court allows the defendant to amend the answer. In that case, our supreme court explains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219082 - 2019-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
placement. Gutting’s analysis is incorrect. The court properly viewed this case as a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105006 - 2017-09-21
placement. Gutting’s analysis is incorrect. The court properly viewed this case as a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105006 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
orders in that [family court] case. For example, there is a January 13, 2015 order that outlines what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172919 - 2017-09-21
orders in that [family court] case. For example, there is a January 13, 2015 order that outlines what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172919 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factors that applied in this case. The circuit court’s lengthy sentencing decision is replete with its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669339 - 2023-06-20
factors that applied in this case. The circuit court’s lengthy sentencing decision is replete with its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669339 - 2023-06-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and that there is no timely appeal in this case that gives this court jurisdiction to review the trial court’s order. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171630 - 2017-09-21
and that there is no timely appeal in this case that gives this court jurisdiction to review the trial court’s order. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171630 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, this court again informed Savvy Woman that we had not received a brief from Savvy Woman and that the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194807 - 2017-09-21
, this court again informed Savvy Woman that we had not received a brief from Savvy Woman and that the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194807 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the circuit court in that earlier case, Waukesha County Case No. 19CV995, while Hoeller’s appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484228 - 2022-02-16
with the circuit court in that earlier case, Waukesha County Case No. 19CV995, while Hoeller’s appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484228 - 2022-02-16