Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22761 - 22770 of 68731 for did.
Search results 22761 - 22770 of 68731 for did.
State v. Antonio Valtierrez
Valtierrez did not testify at trial. His account of the incident—that the shooting was in self defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5517 - 2005-03-31
Valtierrez did not testify at trial. His account of the incident—that the shooting was in self defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5517 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Yolanda Springfield-Woodard v.
-Woodard, who did not respond. After being notified that the dealership filed a grievance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17103 - 2017-09-21
-Woodard, who did not respond. After being notified that the dealership filed a grievance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17103 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he owed her $9300 for a “roofing/wrapping job” that he did not complete. The case was set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216033 - 2018-07-25
that he owed her $9300 for a “roofing/wrapping job” that he did not complete. The case was set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216033 - 2018-07-25
Ronald W. Morters v. Joseph R. Kuenzli and Shila A. Kuenzili
of the hearing, the trial court made findings of fact determining that Morters did not discharge Attorney Barr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13686 - 2005-03-31
of the hearing, the trial court made findings of fact determining that Morters did not discharge Attorney Barr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13686 - 2005-03-31
State v. Monika S. Lackershire
] Lackershire argues her plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because: (1) she did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20271 - 2006-01-09
] Lackershire argues her plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because: (1) she did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20271 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
the rezoning did not violate any of Whitbeck’s due process rights because the Board considered the necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29038 - 2014-09-15
the rezoning did not violate any of Whitbeck’s due process rights because the Board considered the necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29038 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. John A. Jipson
motion for plea withdrawal and resentencing. Jipson argues he did not know the State had to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6335 - 2017-09-19
motion for plea withdrawal and resentencing. Jipson argues he did not know the State had to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6335 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by which a run-off would be deemed successful. ¶9 The first run-off did not occur until January 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164095 - 2017-09-21
by which a run-off would be deemed successful. ¶9 The first run-off did not occur until January 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164095 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the rezoning did not violate any of Whitbeck’s due process rights because the Board considered the necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29038 - 2007-05-14
the rezoning did not violate any of Whitbeck’s due process rights because the Board considered the necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29038 - 2007-05-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
breached a fiduciary duty to Managing Member by serving as its attorney in Indiana when she did not hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61469 - 2014-09-15
breached a fiduciary duty to Managing Member by serving as its attorney in Indiana when she did not hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61469 - 2014-09-15