Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22761 - 22770 of 40330 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] Appeal No. 2011AP1572 Cir. Ct. No. 2010CV4434
public statements by opponents and proponents of the marriage amendment that were made prior
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84445 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the unsubstantiated hearsay statements in the hearing transcript, there was substantial other evidence, expressly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300630 - 2020-11-04

Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Marion L. M.
with the following statement: I now turn my attention to 48.427(2) which provides me with the statutory authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4302 - 2005-03-31

09AP1379 State v. Eric D. Genge
restitution. He also claims that the statements made by his probation agent are “questionable.” Specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45888 - 2010-01-19

[PDF] Michael A. Stauffacher v. Douglas E. Stoneman
, despite advising the trial court in his opening statement that he would “show evidence that my actual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10712 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Richard W. Foelker
throw it away." Foelker demanded and received a written statement from the doctor stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10528 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] City of West Allis v. Robert C. Braun
the statements of the principal and police officers. ¶5 At a subsequent hearing, the trial court ruled from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7127 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the hearing occurred; interrupted and fought with the State before listening to its full statement; and did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640974 - 2023-04-05

[PDF] NOTICE
At another point in his testimony, Miller made a statement that might be taken to partially contradict his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57605 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Clinton N. Mansker
, 335 (Ct. App. 1995). Mansker’s motion was supported only by his statement that he suffered “black
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12052 - 2014-09-15