Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22761 - 22770 of 64166 for records.
Search results 22761 - 22770 of 64166 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259154 - 2020-04-30
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259154 - 2020-04-30
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Division of Hearings and Appeals (“DHA”). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95780 - 2014-09-15
Division of Hearings and Appeals (“DHA”). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95780 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the facts of record and the relevant law. Id., ¶3. The circuit court should “specify the objectives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202700 - 2017-11-21
on the facts of record and the relevant law. Id., ¶3. The circuit court should “specify the objectives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202700 - 2017-11-21
COURT OF APPEALS
barred from arguing his trial and postconviction counsel were ineffective because the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30954 - 2007-11-19
barred from arguing his trial and postconviction counsel were ineffective because the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30954 - 2007-11-19
James L. Ard v. Patricia A. Ard
search the record for reasons to sustain the circuit court’s discretionary decision, not for evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25724 - 2006-03-31
search the record for reasons to sustain the circuit court’s discretionary decision, not for evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25724 - 2006-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98002 - 2005-03-31
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98002 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michelle L. Denzer
, for the record, I would like to object on behalf of the State.” Not only was the objection general, failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15859 - 2005-03-31
, for the record, I would like to object on behalf of the State.” Not only was the objection general, failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15859 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. The record must show that the court’s discretionary decision had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33222 - 2008-07-01
, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. The record must show that the court’s discretionary decision had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33222 - 2008-07-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2024AP205-CRNM 2 upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886969 - 2024-12-10
. No. 2024AP205-CRNM 2 upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886969 - 2024-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS
acted reasonably. See id. at 681-82. Proper sentencing discretion is demonstrated if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75275 - 2011-12-19
acted reasonably. See id. at 681-82. Proper sentencing discretion is demonstrated if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75275 - 2011-12-19