Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22771 - 22780 of 29823 for des.
Search results 22771 - 22780 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not perform a Sullivan analysis in this case, thus our review of this issue is de novo. See id. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89343 - 2014-09-15
not perform a Sullivan analysis in this case, thus our review of this issue is de novo. See id. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89343 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both prongs of the test if the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303324 - 2020-11-11
this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both prongs of the test if the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303324 - 2020-11-11
WI App 160 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP3159 Complete Title...
of law that we review de novo. Sanders v. Estate of Sanders, 2008 WI 63, ¶21, 310 Wis. 2d 175, 750 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73604 - 2011-12-13
of law that we review de novo. Sanders v. Estate of Sanders, 2008 WI 63, ¶21, 310 Wis. 2d 175, 750 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73604 - 2011-12-13
Robert G. Fish v. Margaret W. Fish
decide de novo, without deference to the trial court. See Levy v. Levy, 130 Wis.2d 523, 528-29, 388 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8082 - 2005-03-31
decide de novo, without deference to the trial court. See Levy v. Levy, 130 Wis.2d 523, 528-29, 388 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8082 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Frank Miles
) & 161.48(2), STATS. Interpretation of a statute presents an issue of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12468 - 2017-09-21
) & 161.48(2), STATS. Interpretation of a statute presents an issue of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12468 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Alan Adin Randall
. Gladney, 120 Wis.2d 486, 490, 355 N.W.2d 547, 549 (Ct. App. 1984). However, we consider de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12115 - 2017-09-21
. Gladney, 120 Wis.2d 486, 490, 355 N.W.2d 547, 549 (Ct. App. 1984). However, we consider de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12115 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Scott E. Williams
of Wis. Stat. § 970.03(10). Questions of statutory interpretation are reviewed de novo by this court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16876 - 2017-09-21
of Wis. Stat. § 970.03(10). Questions of statutory interpretation are reviewed de novo by this court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16876 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
. or Brief Subm. CA Dist./ Cty. CA Decision 2025AP2121- OA Voces de la Frontera, Inc v. Dave
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047416 - 2025-12-04
. or Brief Subm. CA Dist./ Cty. CA Decision 2025AP2121- OA Voces de la Frontera, Inc v. Dave
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047416 - 2025-12-04
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
. or Brief Subm. CA Dist./ Cty. CA Decision 2025AP2121- OA Voces de la Frontera, Inc v. Dave
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052661 - 2025-12-16
. or Brief Subm. CA Dist./ Cty. CA Decision 2025AP2121- OA Voces de la Frontera, Inc v. Dave
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052661 - 2025-12-16
[PDF]
Reply Brief per CTO of 11-17-21 (Congressmen)
, and RONALD ZAHN, PETITIONERS, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES, VOCES DE LA FRONTERA, LEAGUE
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/replybrcongressmen.pdf - 2022-01-05
, and RONALD ZAHN, PETITIONERS, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES, VOCES DE LA FRONTERA, LEAGUE
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/replybrcongressmen.pdf - 2022-01-05