Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22771 - 22780 of 29823 for des.

Thomas M. Berends v. Mack Truck, Inc.
). Statutory construction presents a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3804 - 2005-03-31

Charles F. Kozlik v. Gulf Insurance Company
the interest award. We review the validity of a statutory settlement offer de novo. See Staehler v. Beuthin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6079 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
, which also presents questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 2007 WI App 41, ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32348 - 2011-06-14

State v. Reginald Green
requiring this court to construe § 943.28, Stats. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See State v. Sostre
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10482 - 2005-03-31

2010 WI APP 9
to de novo review. See State v. Long, 2009 WI 36, ¶20, 317 Wis. 2d 92, 765 N.W.2d 557. ¶6 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44174 - 2011-02-07

WI App 88 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1362-CR Complete Tit...
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. State v. Hughes, 218 Wis. 2d 538, 543, 582 N.W.2d 49 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63758 - 2012-02-19

State v. Gwyn J. Johnson
” within ch. 551, are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Sveum, 2002 WI App 105, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3877 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 160
. No. 2008AP1845 7 ¶8 We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42706 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Richard Vultaggio v. Caryl Yasko
of a defamatory meaning is a question of law that we decide de novo. Wozniak v. Local 1111 of UE, 57 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2290 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both components
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234705 - 2019-02-12