Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22771 - 22780 of 68360 for did.
Search results 22771 - 22780 of 68360 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that could include aggravating allegations. Grimes asserts that trial counsel did not review the PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052508 - 2025-12-18
that could include aggravating allegations. Grimes asserts that trial counsel did not review the PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052508 - 2025-12-18
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy D. Russ
called his interpreters to the stand, never called his trial attorney, and did not take the stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20692 - 2017-09-21
called his interpreters to the stand, never called his trial attorney, and did not take the stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20692 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
told him on the phone I would not talk to him [and] that I did not trust the Sheriff’s department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=905443 - 2025-01-24
told him on the phone I would not talk to him [and] that I did not trust the Sheriff’s department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=905443 - 2025-01-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
daddy did?” Howard stated that T.K. also told her that: (1) Reginald would put C.T. in the bathroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64622 - 2014-09-15
daddy did?” Howard stated that T.K. also told her that: (1) Reginald would put C.T. in the bathroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64622 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
One of Missimer’s defenses to the complaint was that she did not have an obligation to pay Ross’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36410 - 2009-05-06
One of Missimer’s defenses to the complaint was that she did not have an obligation to pay Ross’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36410 - 2009-05-06
State v. Mahlick D. Ellington
defense was that her injuries did not constitute “great bodily harm.” “‘Great bodily’ harm means bodily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20039 - 2005-12-11
defense was that her injuries did not constitute “great bodily harm.” “‘Great bodily’ harm means bodily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20039 - 2005-12-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court’s comments suggest it believed that D.W. did not have a right to be physically present
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168807 - 2017-09-21
. The circuit court’s comments suggest it believed that D.W. did not have a right to be physically present
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168807 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ray M. Thompson v. WI Department of Public Instruction
of any pupil; and (3) it determined that the department did not prove by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8384 - 2017-09-19
of any pupil; and (3) it determined that the department did not prove by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8384 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
has indicated, she could’ve did differently, could’ve done better. She has certainly undergone more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934263 - 2025-04-02
has indicated, she could’ve did differently, could’ve done better. She has certainly undergone more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934263 - 2025-04-02
State v. Juan Eugenio
daughter at trial. The trial court, however, denied the motion, reasoning that the evidence did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10834 - 2005-03-31
daughter at trial. The trial court, however, denied the motion, reasoning that the evidence did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10834 - 2005-03-31