Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22771 - 22780 of 76667 for i j.

COURT OF APPEALS
acknowledged he did not have a degree, but “[j]ust from seeing windows over the years … I felt it was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93365 - 2013-02-27

Silver Lake Sanitary District v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
VERGERONT, J. (concurring). I agree with the conclusion of the majority opinion that DNR does not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15226 - 2005-03-31

Heather A. Rippl v. Board of Bar Examiners
, and oral argument by Michael B. Van Sicklen. For the respondent the cause was argued by Thomas J
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16429 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COMMITMENT OF C. J. A.: OUTAGAMIE COUNTY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V. C. J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=788867 - 2024-04-12

[PDF] Silver Lake Sanitary District v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
-0620(C) ¶17 VERGERONT, J. (concurring). I agree with the conclusion of the majority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15226 - 2017-09-21

S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
: Dissented: Sundby, J. Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9994 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and was employed as a plant manager by J & L Wire Cloth in St. Paul. His annual salary as of 2012 was $85,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98830 - 2014-09-15

Miller Brewing Company v. Department of Industry
. For the defendant-co-appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Michael J. Edmonds, Milwaukee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16918 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
) JUDGES: Gartzke, P.J., Sundby and Vergeront, JJ. Concurred: Dissented: Sundby, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9994 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 87
, J. Concurred: Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the defendant-appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452482 - 2022-01-13