Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22771 - 22780 of 68235 for law.

[PDF] State v. Luis E. Hernandez
satisfy the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of reasonableness is a question of law which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3106 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, applied a proper standard of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98320 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to governmental immunity—that she was performing ministerial duties imposed by law when she required the plan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239489 - 2019-04-23

[PDF] Basic Metals, Inc. v. Mahzel Metals
agree with Mahzel’s further argument that Basic’s action is barred under the law of accord
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19601 - 2017-09-21

WI App 126 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP60 Complete Title of ...
to conversion is a question of law which we review de novo. Kersten v. H.C. Prange Co., 186 Wis. 2d 49, 56, 520
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102248 - 2013-10-29

State v. Luis E. Hernandez
of reasonableness is a question of law which we decide de novo. State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3106 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John Erickson v. City of Janesville
-0446 -4- The application of § 893.80(4), STATS., to a set of facts is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8644 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the court erred by declining to consider marital property law in determining the amount of the award. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659761 - 2023-05-25

[PDF] New Horizons Supply Cooperative v. George Haack
testimony to the court” regarding Wisconsin’s limited liability company law, and that the cooperative did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14208 - 2014-09-15

State v. Dale W. Robinson
the requirements for submitting to a chemical test under Wisconsin's implied consent law.[2] Crandall initialed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11237 - 2005-03-31