Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22771 - 22780 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Arthur Beiersdorf
the judgments of conviction for second-degree sexual assault of a child and bail jumping, and from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9012 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
argues the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it declined to give the aggravated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143746 - 2017-09-21

State v. Robert M. Speese
concluded that a new trial was needed on the sexual assault charges involving the victim regardless
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16856 - 2005-03-31

Kenneth P. Mader v. Community Credit Plan, Inc.
not lie. The two trial courts handling these three cases granted summary judgment to the creditor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13386 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
twenty-three causes of action.2 After much discovery and a four-day trial, the circuit court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12656 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
after a jury found Rouse’s negligence did not cause Woods any injury. Woods argues the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143746 - 2015-06-29

[PDF] Frank M. Kett v. Community Credit Plan, Inc.
to commence replevin actions in a county where venue does not lie. The two trial courts handling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13382 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] James B. Linden v. Cascade Stone Company, Inc.
) the economic loss doctrine does not bar their negligence claims; (2) the trial court erred in dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7204 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Thomas Roskos v. Mary Mellowes
argues that the trial court should have granted its postverdict motion challenging the jury’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11152 - 2017-09-19

Anthony Kish v. Health Personnel Options Corporation
those same assets. HPO argues that the trial court erred by: permitting Action to sue for breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13001 - 2005-03-31