Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22781 - 22790 of 84303 for case number.
Search results 22781 - 22790 of 84303 for case number.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
responsibility. See WIS. STAT. § 48.415(2), (6). An amended petition in A.A.L.’s case later added
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058668 - 2026-01-06
responsibility. See WIS. STAT. § 48.415(2), (6). An amended petition in A.A.L.’s case later added
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058668 - 2026-01-06
[PDF]
WI APP 57
2010 WI APP 57 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP817-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48024 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 57 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP817-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48024 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and the circuit court case record, and we requested that appointed appellate counsel provide Clark with those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971583 - 2025-06-18
and the circuit court case record, and we requested that appointed appellate counsel provide Clark with those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971583 - 2025-06-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
responsibility. See WIS. STAT. § 48.415(2), (6). An amended petition in A.A.L.’s case later added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058668 - 2026-01-06
responsibility. See WIS. STAT. § 48.415(2), (6). An amended petition in A.A.L.’s case later added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058668 - 2026-01-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
for a drug sniff.2 Lord subsequently pled guilty. DISCUSSION ¶5 The issue in this case is whether Lord
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35212 - 2014-09-15
for a drug sniff.2 Lord subsequently pled guilty. DISCUSSION ¶5 The issue in this case is whether Lord
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35212 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Kazim Investment, Inc.
2004 WI App 13 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-0404
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6160 - 2017-09-19
2004 WI App 13 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-0404
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6160 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the prescribed time period. ¶4 The circuit court determined, after reading the briefs and the cited case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88770 - 2012-10-29
the prescribed time period. ¶4 The circuit court determined, after reading the briefs and the cited case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88770 - 2012-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078680 - 2026-02-17
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078680 - 2026-02-17
N.E.M. v. Eugene Strigel
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8782 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8782 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. §§ 752.31(2)(b) & (3) dictate that in municipal ordinance violation cases only one judge decides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88770 - 2014-09-15
. STAT. §§ 752.31(2)(b) & (3) dictate that in municipal ordinance violation cases only one judge decides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88770 - 2014-09-15