Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22781 - 22790 of 30243 for de.
Search results 22781 - 22790 of 30243 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See United Rentals, Inc. v. City of Madison, 2007 WI App 131, ¶11, 302 Wis. 2d 245, 733
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71885 - 2011-10-05
review de novo. See United Rentals, Inc. v. City of Madison, 2007 WI App 131, ¶11, 302 Wis. 2d 245, 733
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71885 - 2011-10-05
State v. Danuele M. Johnson
, after our de novo review, if the trial court reached the right result, although for the wrong reason, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7408 - 2005-03-31
, after our de novo review, if the trial court reached the right result, although for the wrong reason, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7408 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Seafood Company, Inc. v. David P. Fisher
review de novo. Where the terms of a contract are plain and unambiguous, we will construe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4218 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Where the terms of a contract are plain and unambiguous, we will construe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4218 - 2005-03-31
Jennifer L. Weston v. Matthew J. B.
the correct legal standard is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Gallagher v. Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20999 - 2006-01-18
the correct legal standard is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Gallagher v. Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20999 - 2006-01-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion.” State v. Jensen, 2007 WI App 256, ¶9, 306 Wis. 2d 572, 743 N.W.2d 468. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187321 - 2017-09-21
discretion.” State v. Jensen, 2007 WI App 256, ¶9, 306 Wis. 2d 572, 743 N.W.2d 468. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187321 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 17
¶14 The interpretation of an insurance contract is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76637 - 2014-09-15
¶14 The interpretation of an insurance contract is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76637 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Shane M. Ferguson
de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446, cert. denied, 504 U.S. 978 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2112 - 2017-09-19
de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446, cert. denied, 504 U.S. 978 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2112 - 2017-09-19
Jeffrey Schwigel v. David J. Kohlmann
a de novo standard of review. Id., ¶¶47‑48. ¶19 “[T]he purpose of punitive damages is to punish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7345 - 2005-03-31
a de novo standard of review. Id., ¶¶47‑48. ¶19 “[T]he purpose of punitive damages is to punish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7345 - 2005-03-31
Doris H. Krohn v. Jerome Krohn
if the reasoning is not expressly stated. See Schauer v. De Neveu Homeowners Ass'n Inc., 194 Wis.2d 62, 71, 533
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11326 - 2005-03-31
if the reasoning is not expressly stated. See Schauer v. De Neveu Homeowners Ass'n Inc., 194 Wis.2d 62, 71, 533
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11326 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
uphold the [circuit] court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001148 - 2025-08-26
uphold the [circuit] court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001148 - 2025-08-26