Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22781 - 22790 of 68502 for did.
Search results 22781 - 22790 of 68502 for did.
State v. Derrick Benton
. He did not identify Benton from the array, and he later testified that he said he did not recognize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2527 - 2005-03-31
. He did not identify Benton from the array, and he later testified that he said he did not recognize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2527 - 2005-03-31
State v. Monika S. Lackershire
] Lackershire argues her plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because: (1) she did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20271 - 2006-01-09
] Lackershire argues her plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because: (1) she did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20271 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, did not file his report until September 5, 2023, one day before the final hearing. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913923 - 2025-02-11
, did not file his report until September 5, 2023, one day before the final hearing. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913923 - 2025-02-11
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - March 2016
that the procedural change in § 973.198 did not violate the ex post facto clauses, and the Court of Appeals
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163220 - 2017-09-21
that the procedural change in § 973.198 did not violate the ex post facto clauses, and the Court of Appeals
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163220 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because he did not have any assets or income at that time. Counsel argued that Grady had a six-month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=827235 - 2024-07-17
because he did not have any assets or income at that time. Counsel argued that Grady had a six-month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=827235 - 2024-07-17
State v. Vincent Lee Summers
Summers concerning the charges. Payne testified that after he told Summers that he did not believe his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16272 - 2005-03-31
Summers concerning the charges. Payne testified that after he told Summers that he did not believe his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16272 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence H. Ross
after receiving the Miranda warnings did not constitute an unambiguous and unequivocal invocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9218 - 2017-09-19
after receiving the Miranda warnings did not constitute an unambiguous and unequivocal invocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9218 - 2017-09-19
Ray A. Peterson v. Department of Industry
, and the United States Supreme Court. The court reasoned that it did not have the authority to award attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14902 - 2005-03-31
, and the United States Supreme Court. The court reasoned that it did not have the authority to award attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14902 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
did not have an obligation to pay Ross’s medical bills because they were separated at the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36410 - 2014-09-15
did not have an obligation to pay Ross’s medical bills because they were separated at the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36410 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James Knight v. Labor and Industry Review Commission of the Department of Industry
of America did not discriminate against him on the basis of his conviction record in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12569 - 2017-09-21
of America did not discriminate against him on the basis of his conviction record in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12569 - 2017-09-21