Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22791 - 22800 of 83001 for case codes/1000.

[PDF] NOTICE
, each charging assaults against a different victim. The cases were subsequently joined and tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39992 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
conviction, and orders denying motions for sentence modification in each case. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26847 - 2006-10-18

[PDF] City of Oshkosh v. Gail L. Palecek
discretion in admitting her statements and because prior published case law establishes that Miranda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11608 - 2017-09-19

First Federal Savings Bank LaCrosse-Madison v. Patricia A. Vetterkind
relief the judgment can afford is replevin. This court agrees and, accordingly, remands the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10572 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2002
2 2002 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Appeal No. 2006AP1694-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2005CT184
if the case were retried, and the court’s conclusion that “equity would demand that someone … pay
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29942 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
conclude that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190555 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, the court imposed domestic abuse assessments against Delvalle in two separate cases. As a condition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685261 - 2023-08-01

[PDF] State v. Michael Galletto
court denied the motion. ¶4 The case proceeded to trial and Galletto was convicted again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3213 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Juanita Newman v. The City of Delafield
of limitations. We conclude that this case is a trespass case governed by the six-year statute of limitations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15750 - 2017-09-21