Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2281 - 2290 of 3972 for davy.
Search results 2281 - 2290 of 3972 for davy.
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - December 2020
the administration of a polygraph examination. In State v. Davis, 2008 WI 71, 310 Wis. 2d 583, 751 N.W.2d 332
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311859 - 2020-12-15
the administration of a polygraph examination. In State v. Davis, 2008 WI 71, 310 Wis. 2d 583, 751 N.W.2d 332
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311859 - 2020-12-15
[PDF]
WI APP 77
., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Concurred: Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305587 - 2021-01-08
., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Concurred: Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305587 - 2021-01-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a decision that this court reviews for an erroneous exercise of discretion. See State v. Davis, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1079014 - 2026-02-17
is a decision that this court reviews for an erroneous exercise of discretion. See State v. Davis, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1079014 - 2026-02-17
[PDF]
Leo E. Borne v. Gonstead Advanced Techniques, Inc.
is in accord with that of at least one other jurisdiction. See Gilman v. Davis, 67 P.3d 78, 81 (Idaho 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5141 - 2017-09-19
is in accord with that of at least one other jurisdiction. See Gilman v. Davis, 67 P.3d 78, 81 (Idaho 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5141 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the exclusionary rule is not “designed to ‘redress the injury’ occasioned by an unconstitutional search.” Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247234 - 2019-09-24
the exclusionary rule is not “designed to ‘redress the injury’ occasioned by an unconstitutional search.” Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247234 - 2019-09-24
[PDF]
WI APP 108
of the circuit court for Jefferson County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Reversed. Before Dykman, P.J., Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51562 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Jefferson County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Reversed. Before Dykman, P.J., Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51562 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 72
: JUDGES: Neubauer, C.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Concurred: Dissented: 2 Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300102 - 2020-12-08
: JUDGES: Neubauer, C.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Concurred: Dissented: 2 Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300102 - 2020-12-08
Leo E. Borne v. Gonstead Advanced Techniques, Inc.
is in accord with that of at least one other jurisdiction. See Gilman v. Davis, 67 P.3d 78, 81 (Idaho 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5141 - 2005-03-31
is in accord with that of at least one other jurisdiction. See Gilman v. Davis, 67 P.3d 78, 81 (Idaho 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5141 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 108
, Respondents. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Jefferson County: j. mac davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51562 - 2010-08-24
, Respondents. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Jefferson County: j. mac davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51562 - 2010-08-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
properly denied Newson’s motions for default judgment against the county defendants. See Davis v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654684 - 2023-05-09
properly denied Newson’s motions for default judgment against the county defendants. See Davis v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654684 - 2023-05-09