Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2281 - 2290 of 63489 for records.
Search results 2281 - 2290 of 63489 for records.
State v. Christopher Phillip Ries
. The defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9620 - 2005-03-31
. The defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9620 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to its appendix rather than the record, and filing a late reply brief. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32150 - 2014-09-15
to its appendix rather than the record, and filing a late reply brief. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32150 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177509 - 2017-09-21
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177509 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
police department records under the name “Payback” and found a record linking White to that name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56128 - 2014-09-15
police department records under the name “Payback” and found a record linking White to that name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56128 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Phillip Ries
of the defendant. The defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9620 - 2017-09-19
of the defendant. The defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9620 - 2017-09-19
State v. Clarence L. Martin
of his right to respond, but has elected not to do so. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12396 - 2005-03-31
of his right to respond, but has elected not to do so. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12396 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his motion to reconstruct the record. He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60262 - 2011-02-22
an order denying his motion to reconstruct the record. He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60262 - 2011-02-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
in denying his motion to compel the release of his victim’s psychological records for an in camera review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96631 - 2014-09-15
in denying his motion to compel the release of his victim’s psychological records for an in camera review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96631 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95891 - 2014-09-15
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95891 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to file a response, and has not done so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=637987 - 2023-03-30
right to file a response, and has not done so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=637987 - 2023-03-30