Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22811 - 22820 of 74509 for public records.
Search results 22811 - 22820 of 74509 for public records.
Robert Bingen v. Lisa Bzdusek
will call the roll call and the Town Clerk will record each vote as the vote is announced. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4578 - 2005-03-31
will call the roll call and the Town Clerk will record each vote as the vote is announced. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4578 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
components that were used to record and tally the votes in the election.” The statute defines “software
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259014 - 2020-04-30
components that were used to record and tally the votes in the election.” The statute defines “software
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259014 - 2020-04-30
[PDF]
Martin C. H. v. Jill E. S.
“according to accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.” State v. Fishnick, 127
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25682 - 2017-09-21
“according to accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.” State v. Fishnick, 127
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25682 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 125
. Publication 525 (2002)”: “A recovery is a return of an amount you deducted or took a credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28539 - 2014-09-15
. Publication 525 (2002)”: “A recovery is a return of an amount you deducted or took a credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28539 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth L. Champion
prejudice to the defendant against the public's interest in avoiding unnecessary or duplicative trials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9641 - 2017-09-19
prejudice to the defendant against the public's interest in avoiding unnecessary or duplicative trials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9641 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gregg S. Pate
procedures were inadequate; and (4) the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13431 - 2017-09-21
procedures were inadequate; and (4) the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13431 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gary A. Michels
to § 346.65(6). The record is unclear as to why the State did not exercise this authority. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4672 - 2005-03-31
to § 346.65(6). The record is unclear as to why the State did not exercise this authority. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4672 - 2005-03-31
Joseph Ermenc v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
effect. See Rabalais, 671 So. 2d at 9. The record in this case does not support such a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13665 - 2005-03-31
effect. See Rabalais, 671 So. 2d at 9. The record in this case does not support such a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13665 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David J. Winkel v.
2 ¶2 We determine that the public reprimand recommended by the referee is the appropriate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17200 - 2017-09-21
2 ¶2 We determine that the public reprimand recommended by the referee is the appropriate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17200 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Nathaniel A. Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
of a person’s parental rights on the ability to pay record preparation fees); Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5285 - 2017-09-19
of a person’s parental rights on the ability to pay record preparation fees); Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5285 - 2017-09-19