Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22811 - 22820 of 83379 for simple case search.
Search results 22811 - 22820 of 83379 for simple case search.
State v. Mark J. Modory
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10304 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10304 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2015AP1196-CR 3 surcharge in 2001 on a felony drug case. All of Howard’s requests were denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163180 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2015AP1196-CR 3 surcharge in 2001 on a felony drug case. All of Howard’s requests were denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163180 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any different than any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12448 - 2017-09-21
testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any different than any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12448 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any different than any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12450 - 2017-09-21
testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any different than any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12450 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2009AP3073-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2007CT1130
the tests of the blood sample in Griep’s case, but he testified in place of the analyst who conducted
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96661 - 2014-09-15
the tests of the blood sample in Griep’s case, but he testified in place of the analyst who conducted
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96661 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any different than any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12449 - 2017-09-21
testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any different than any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12449 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076014 - 2026-02-10
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076014 - 2026-02-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and stay away from court. As a result, Lopez faced several criminal charges filed as two cases: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023100 - 2025-10-14
and stay away from court. As a result, Lopez faced several criminal charges filed as two cases: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023100 - 2025-10-14
[PDF]
State v. Michael B. Ilkka
affirm. 1 This case is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16175 - 2017-09-21
affirm. 1 This case is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16175 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076014 - 2026-02-10
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076014 - 2026-02-10