Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22821 - 22830 of 62027 for child support.

[PDF] Travis Tucker v. State of Wisconsin Division of Hearings
argues on appeal that the evidence in this case did not support the DOC’s decision to revoke his parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15390 - 2017-09-21

Marathon County v. Allison S.C.
evidence to support the court's finding that she was a danger to herself. Because this court concludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11141 - 2005-03-31

Travis Tucker v. State of Wisconsin Division of Hearings
not support the DOC’s decision to revoke his parole. Tucker was convicted of first-degree intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15390 - 2007-11-27

[PDF] State v. Charles Dante Higgs
argues that the complaint stated no facts to support the conclusion that his throwing a cup of urine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14195 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is supported neither by its findings of fact nor by sufficient evidence; (2) the La Crosse County circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171647 - 2017-09-21

State v. Charles Dante Higgs
that the complaint stated no facts to support the conclusion that his throwing a cup of urine directly into another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14195 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
receiving this affidavit, the court deemed the averments sufficient to support a cause of action against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174334 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 19-22 - Comments from Judge Shelley J. Gaylord
in support of the proposed changes to continuing education for circuit court judges and commissioners
/supreme/docs/1922commentsgaylord.pdf - 2020-02-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
her base salary as $70,000. The record does not support this assertion. The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338854 - 2021-02-25

Mark Olsen v. Edward Hoffmann
Consumer Act supports reopening, Mared Indus. v. Mansfield, 2005 WI 5, 277 Wis. 2d 350, 690 N.W.2d 835
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24751 - 2006-04-10