Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22821 - 22830 of 97708 for court records search online.
Search results 22821 - 22830 of 97708 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 29, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52694 - 2010-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 29, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52694 - 2010-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
factor, we conclude the record supports an exercise of circuit court discretion sufficient for us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80189 - 2012-04-02
factor, we conclude the record supports an exercise of circuit court discretion sufficient for us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80189 - 2012-04-02
COURT OF APPEALS
. The State and Lindholm went on the record with this agreement and the Jefferson county circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36571 - 2009-05-26
. The State and Lindholm went on the record with this agreement and the Jefferson county circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36571 - 2009-05-26
COURT OF APPEALS
).[1] The circuit court must conduct a personal colloquy with the defendant on the record to ensure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100358 - 2013-08-05
).[1] The circuit court must conduct a personal colloquy with the defendant on the record to ensure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100358 - 2013-08-05
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 11, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33976 - 2008-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 11, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33976 - 2008-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
be reduced after that challenge. The record belies Hamilton’s claim. The circuit court explicitly told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117566 - 2014-07-21
be reduced after that challenge. The record belies Hamilton’s claim. The circuit court explicitly told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117566 - 2014-07-21
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 17, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43511 - 2009-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 17, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43511 - 2009-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 21, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119836 - 2014-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 21, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119836 - 2014-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 28, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42688 - 2009-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 28, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42688 - 2009-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
the record whether the court considered Margaret’s request to deviate from the percentage standard and, if so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75595 - 2011-12-27
the record whether the court considered Margaret’s request to deviate from the percentage standard and, if so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75595 - 2011-12-27