Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22821 - 22830 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 22821 - 22830 of 63951 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
municipal court cases. As far as the briefing and record disclose, the cases involved numerous, ongoing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165189 - 2017-09-21
municipal court cases. As far as the briefing and record disclose, the cases involved numerous, ongoing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165189 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to show an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70535 - 2014-09-15
to show an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70535 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the records sought were not material. State v. Henderson, No. 00-2506, unpublished slip op. at 4 (WI App Oct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30675 - 2007-10-22
that the records sought were not material. State v. Henderson, No. 00-2506, unpublished slip op. at 4 (WI App Oct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30675 - 2007-10-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603646 - 2022-12-22
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603646 - 2022-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Waylon A. Meyer
and based upon the facts appearing in the record and in reliance upon the applicable law. Hartung v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17629 - 2017-09-21
and based upon the facts appearing in the record and in reliance upon the applicable law. Hartung v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17629 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541064 - 2022-07-12
of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541064 - 2022-07-12
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Based on the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94386 - 2014-09-15
Based on the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94386 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129467 - 2017-09-21
not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129467 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264839 - 2020-06-23
. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264839 - 2020-06-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138738 - 2017-09-21
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138738 - 2017-09-21