Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22821 - 22830 of 76565 for see.
Search results 22821 - 22830 of 76565 for see.
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm. Bradlee Baird and Kelly Baird
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94392 - 2013-03-18
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm. Bradlee Baird and Kelly Baird
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94392 - 2013-03-18
Mary Sevcik v. Secura Insurance
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5921 - 2005-03-31
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5921 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. There is no manifest injustice upon which Copeland could withdraw his plea. See State v. Duychak, 133 Wis. 2d 307
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96657 - 2014-09-15
. There is no manifest injustice upon which Copeland could withdraw his plea. See State v. Duychak, 133 Wis. 2d 307
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96657 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).2 We affirm. We independently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259179 - 2020-05-06
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).2 We affirm. We independently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259179 - 2020-05-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2019-20);1 Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592573 - 2022-11-22
report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2019-20);1 Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592573 - 2022-11-22
State v. Erin L. Hill
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7541 - 2005-03-31
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7541 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21.1 We summarily affirm. Shaw was convicted, after entry of a no-contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147922 - 2017-09-21
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21.1 We summarily affirm. Shaw was convicted, after entry of a no-contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147922 - 2017-09-21
Chris J. Jacobs v. Gary R. McCaughtry
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6259 - 2005-03-31
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6259 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31422 - 2008-01-07
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31422 - 2008-01-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
affirmed because there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285141 - 2020-09-09
affirmed because there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285141 - 2020-09-09