Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22851 - 22860 of 29942 for des.
Search results 22851 - 22860 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
Walter G. Bohrer, Jr. v. City of Milwaukee
facts presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. Wis. Cent. Ltd. v. DOR, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3266 - 2017-09-19
facts presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. Wis. Cent. Ltd. v. DOR, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3266 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pose questions of law we review de novo. See Mittnacht v. St. Paul Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 2009 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252638 - 2020-01-22
pose questions of law we review de novo. See Mittnacht v. St. Paul Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 2009 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252638 - 2020-01-22
[PDF]
Fred Carlson v. Trailer Equipment and Supply, Inc.
on summary judgment de novo. See id. Second, we review the denial of Carlson’s motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14496 - 2017-09-21
on summary judgment de novo. See id. Second, we review the denial of Carlson’s motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14496 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Walter Lee Thomas
of a stipulation is a question of law; thus, this court will review it de novo. See Duhame v. Duhame, 154 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11162 - 2017-09-19
of a stipulation is a question of law; thus, this court will review it de novo. See Duhame v. Duhame, 154 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11162 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id., ¶21. ¶12 Where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446743 - 2021-11-03
for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id., ¶21. ¶12 Where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446743 - 2021-11-03
George T. Stathus v. James H. Horst
, on which we express no opinion, it was certainly de minimis and not one requiring a new trial. 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2468 - 2005-03-31
, on which we express no opinion, it was certainly de minimis and not one requiring a new trial. 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2468 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deborah E.
subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862-63, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4682 - 2005-03-31
subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862-63, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4682 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jose Carlos Navarro
). However, the interpretation of a treaty is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. King, 212
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5096 - 2005-03-31
). However, the interpretation of a treaty is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. King, 212
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5096 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 30
decision de novo. State ex rel. Milwaukee Police Ass’n v. Jones, 2000 WI App 146, ¶11, 237 Wis. 2d 840
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31683 - 2008-02-19
decision de novo. State ex rel. Milwaukee Police Ass’n v. Jones, 2000 WI App 146, ¶11, 237 Wis. 2d 840
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31683 - 2008-02-19
Patricia Capsavage v. Raymond J. Esser
, this is a question of law and one this court reviews de novo.” GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. Gisvold, 215 Wis.2d 459, 470
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13090 - 2005-03-31
, this is a question of law and one this court reviews de novo.” GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. Gisvold, 215 Wis.2d 459, 470
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13090 - 2005-03-31