Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22851 - 22860 of 29810 for des.

COURT OF APPEALS
, and then we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. State v. Eason, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40531 - 2009-09-08

Susan L. Bellile v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
of law, we review the question de novo, benefiting from the trial court’s analysis. Id. Here, the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6164 - 2005-03-31

Bert L. Warnecke, Sr. v. Bert L. Warnecke II
of Wis. Stat. § 77.88. We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. See State v. Sveum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24663 - 2006-04-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307034 - 2020-11-24

[PDF] William W. Welter v. City of Milwaukee
review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11483 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 36
from the order and the judgment. Standard of Review ¶6 “We review summary judgment decisions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35446 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 131
that are material to this appeal, and we review de novo whether the settlement agreement may be enforced. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88252 - 2014-09-15

State v. Dayna L. Lord
presents a question of law reviewed de novo. Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13522 - 2005-03-31

State v. William E. Marberry
of statutes to undisputed facts are questions of law which we review de novo. See School Bd. v. Bomber, 214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14594 - 2005-03-31

Judith Clemence v. Maryland Casualty Company
summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same methodology as the circuit court. Envirologix Corp. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2821 - 2005-03-31