Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22851 - 22860 of 29713 for des.
Search results 22851 - 22860 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth P. Sarauer
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Williams, 2002 WI 58, ¶7, 253 Wis. 2d 99, 644 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6136 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Williams, 2002 WI 58, ¶7, 253 Wis. 2d 99, 644 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6136 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that applies to the facts of record is a question of law that is No. 2013AP276-CR 8 reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99987 - 2017-09-21
that applies to the facts of record is a question of law that is No. 2013AP276-CR 8 reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99987 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo.” Huml v. Vlazny, 2006 WI 87, ¶13, 293 Wis. 2d 169, 716 N.W.2d 807
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82352 - 2012-05-14
of law we review de novo.” Huml v. Vlazny, 2006 WI 87, ¶13, 293 Wis. 2d 169, 716 N.W.2d 807
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82352 - 2012-05-14
2007 WI APP 17
, we generally review issues of statutory construction de novo. Coutts, 209 Wis. 2d at 663. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27364 - 2007-01-30
, we generally review issues of statutory construction de novo. Coutts, 209 Wis. 2d at 663. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27364 - 2007-01-30
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Martin
-3131 5 law that we review de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 762, 482 N.W.2d 883
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7069 - 2017-09-20
-3131 5 law that we review de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 762, 482 N.W.2d 883
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7069 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
U.S. 348, 353, 356-57 (2015) (rejecting concept of “an acceptable ‘de minimis intrusion’” in context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256754 - 2020-03-17
U.S. 348, 353, 356-57 (2015) (rejecting concept of “an acceptable ‘de minimis intrusion’” in context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256754 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and we review de novo the application of those facts to the constitutional standard. See Post, 301 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33562 - 2014-09-15
, and we review de novo the application of those facts to the constitutional standard. See Post, 301 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33562 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 29, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Ap...
conclusion. Id. We review questions of law de novo. State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis. 2d 656, 664, 245 N.W. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30082 - 2007-08-28
conclusion. Id. We review questions of law de novo. State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis. 2d 656, 664, 245 N.W. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30082 - 2007-08-28
[PDF]
WI APP 147
. 1996). When no material facts are disputed, we are left with questions of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40763 - 2014-09-15
. 1996). When no material facts are disputed, we are left with questions of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40763 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel T. Shea
. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review. See Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12880 - 2005-03-31
. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review. See Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12880 - 2005-03-31