Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22851 - 22860 of 58303 for speedy trial.
Search results 22851 - 22860 of 58303 for speedy trial.
State v. Tomas Consuegra
, Consuegra claimed that he did not knowingly and intelligently enter his plea because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11391 - 2005-03-31
, Consuegra claimed that he did not knowingly and intelligently enter his plea because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11391 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Modrow
are subject to a number of conditions that are generally left to the trial court's discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10203 - 2017-09-20
are subject to a number of conditions that are generally left to the trial court's discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10203 - 2017-09-20
Marathon County v. Daniel J. Hart
judgment against him. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5113 - 2005-03-31
judgment against him. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5113 - 2005-03-31
Marathon County v. Daniel J. Hart
judgment against him. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5112 - 2005-03-31
judgment against him. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5112 - 2005-03-31
Nadine M. Butler v. Robert A. Butler
PER CURIAM. Nadine Butler appeals a divorce judgment. She argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4136 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. Nadine Butler appeals a divorce judgment. She argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4136 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Modrow
are subject to a number of conditions that are generally left to the trial court's discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10204 - 2017-09-20
are subject to a number of conditions that are generally left to the trial court's discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10204 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutional rights; (3) the prosecutor presented evidence at trial that had no relevance to this case; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105004 - 2017-09-21
constitutional rights; (3) the prosecutor presented evidence at trial that had no relevance to this case; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105004 - 2017-09-21
Stephen W. Jones v. Eleanor Swoboda
with the response to his open records requests. The only relief the trial court provided Jones was to order access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9673 - 2005-03-31
with the response to his open records requests. The only relief the trial court provided Jones was to order access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9673 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
is entitled to a new trial because the trial judge failed to honor his substitution request. After reviewing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103978 - 2013-11-04
is entitled to a new trial because the trial judge failed to honor his substitution request. After reviewing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103978 - 2013-11-04
[PDF]
State v. Antwan I. Slater
, and substantial battery. He argues that the trial court improperly exercised its No. 2005AP1804-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21603 - 2017-09-21
, and substantial battery. He argues that the trial court improperly exercised its No. 2005AP1804-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21603 - 2017-09-21