Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22861 - 22870 of 39100 for c's.
Search results 22861 - 22870 of 39100 for c's.
State v. Jeremy J. Hanson
. § 752.31(2)(c) (1997-98). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 1997-98 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16265 - 2005-03-31
. § 752.31(2)(c) (1997-98). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 1997-98 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16265 - 2005-03-31
Heidi Conde v. Robert Krueger
was required to prove alienation, and (c) Wendorf, whose testimony the trial court primarily relied on, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5484 - 2005-03-31
was required to prove alienation, and (c) Wendorf, whose testimony the trial court primarily relied on, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5484 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kimberly A. Tomaras
by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2001-02). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5218 - 2005-03-31
by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2001-02). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5218 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is not moot because “nowhere does the [C]ounty present evidence [K.R.’s] Due Process rights were respected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513264 - 2022-04-27
is not moot because “nowhere does the [C]ounty present evidence [K.R.’s] Due Process rights were respected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513264 - 2022-04-27
[PDF]
State v. Delynn A. Streit
to the enhanced penalties for a third-time offender as set out in WIS. STAT. § 346.65(2)(c). The 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2674 - 2017-09-19
to the enhanced penalties for a third-time offender as set out in WIS. STAT. § 346.65(2)(c). The 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2674 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2017-18). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266474 - 2020-07-03
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2017-18). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266474 - 2020-07-03
COURT OF APPEALS
the seriousness of the underlying offense; (c) demonstrated satisfactory adjustment to the institution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36016 - 2009-03-30
the seriousness of the underlying offense; (c) demonstrated satisfactory adjustment to the institution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36016 - 2009-03-30
State v. Frank J. Steffes
is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(c), Stats, and expedited under Rule 809.17, Stats. [2] Steffes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14807 - 2005-03-31
is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(c), Stats, and expedited under Rule 809.17, Stats. [2] Steffes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14807 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 973.20(13)(c)2., which provides that the circuit court may: “Adjourn the sentencing proceeding for up
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356945 - 2021-04-20
. § 973.20(13)(c)2., which provides that the circuit court may: “Adjourn the sentencing proceeding for up
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356945 - 2021-04-20
[PDF]
State v. Nicholaas P.J. Ligtenberg
own testimony that counsel simply reached a decision without adequate investigation. “[C]ounsel has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5919 - 2017-09-19
own testimony that counsel simply reached a decision without adequate investigation. “[C]ounsel has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5919 - 2017-09-19