Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22871 - 22880 of 59232 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 22871 - 22880 of 59232 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
raised this claim previously—but asserted that he did so “inadequately.” ¶5 The postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108849 - 2014-03-10
raised this claim previously—but asserted that he did so “inadequately.” ¶5 The postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108849 - 2014-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
modification. He claims that an alleged change in his mental health status constitutes a new factor warranting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100417 - 2013-08-05
modification. He claims that an alleged change in his mental health status constitutes a new factor warranting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100417 - 2013-08-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of venue from Winnebago county, and to dismiss the claims against defendants Wright and Benbo for failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-15
of venue from Winnebago county, and to dismiss the claims against defendants Wright and Benbo for failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Town of Perry v. DSG Evergreen F.L.P.
that the violation continued. At this time, the parties also agreed that DSG could reserve the right to claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6291 - 2017-09-19
that the violation continued. At this time, the parties also agreed that DSG could reserve the right to claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6291 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
(and thus whether a victim’s claim should be offset or reduced for any reason) is reviewed under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140695 - 2015-04-28
(and thus whether a victim’s claim should be offset or reduced for any reason) is reviewed under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140695 - 2015-04-28
[PDF]
State v. Arturo Melendez
agreement. He claims the prosecutor breached the plea agreement by recommending the maximum sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12133 - 2017-09-21
agreement. He claims the prosecutor breached the plea agreement by recommending the maximum sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12133 - 2017-09-21
State v. George L. Jones
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Jones claims: (1) his statements should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16320 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Jones claims: (1) his statements should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16320 - 2005-03-31
State v. Chris C. Lichtenberg
to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). Specifically, he claims his right to a speedy trial was violated. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5602 - 2005-03-31
to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). Specifically, he claims his right to a speedy trial was violated. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5602 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
is not procedurally barred, it is insufficiently alleged to maintain an ineffective assistance claim. Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27185 - 2006-11-20
is not procedurally barred, it is insufficiently alleged to maintain an ineffective assistance claim. Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27185 - 2006-11-20
State v. Patrick A. Saunders
claims error, but we note that Wisconsin case law requires Saunders to allege substantial issues of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8053 - 2005-03-31
claims error, but we note that Wisconsin case law requires Saunders to allege substantial issues of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8053 - 2005-03-31