Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22871 - 22880 of 68731 for did.
Search results 22871 - 22880 of 68731 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
—$827.10 to the minor victim’s father and $1575 to her health insurance plan. When Seiler did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238890 - 2019-04-17
—$827.10 to the minor victim’s father and $1575 to her health insurance plan. When Seiler did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238890 - 2019-04-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
testified that they did not stop to purchase drugs anywhere else during the trip. There was also evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731477 - 2023-11-22
testified that they did not stop to purchase drugs anywhere else during the trip. There was also evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731477 - 2023-11-22
COURT OF APPEALS
petitioned the circuit court for an order substituting it as the plaintiff. Teale did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79436 - 2012-03-12
petitioned the circuit court for an order substituting it as the plaintiff. Teale did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79436 - 2012-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
Before trial, the court viewed the scene. At trial, McCoy testified on his own behalf that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65643 - 2011-06-13
Before trial, the court viewed the scene. At trial, McCoy testified on his own behalf that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65643 - 2011-06-13
State v. Gerald J. Clark
that he “did slap her, hit her,” but claimed it was “because he was upset.” Clark’s lawyer noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15945 - 2005-03-31
that he “did slap her, hit her,” but claimed it was “because he was upset.” Clark’s lawyer noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15945 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
state employees. We conclude that he did not and, therefore, we affirm. Johnson’s complaint alleged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980619 - 2025-07-10
state employees. We conclude that he did not and, therefore, we affirm. Johnson’s complaint alleged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980619 - 2025-07-10
[PDF]
State v. Antoinette Kennedy
and because the trial court did not err when it denied her postconviction motion, this court affirms. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4705 - 2017-09-19
and because the trial court did not err when it denied her postconviction motion, this court affirms. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4705 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 2020. It then rescheduled the hearing for September 21, 2020. Woodward did not appear. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=720888 - 2023-11-01
, 2020. It then rescheduled the hearing for September 21, 2020. Woodward did not appear. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=720888 - 2023-11-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
court issued a Decision and Order dated December 27, concluding that § 66.0413 did not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27478 - 2014-09-15
court issued a Decision and Order dated December 27, concluding that § 66.0413 did not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27478 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Gregory Wolf v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
determined that Sinclair and Valentine, L.P. (Sinclair) did not discriminate against Wolf based on an actual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8985 - 2017-09-19
determined that Sinclair and Valentine, L.P. (Sinclair) did not discriminate against Wolf based on an actual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8985 - 2017-09-19