Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22871 - 22880 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 22871 - 22880 of 63951 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Jerome M. Nelligan
test. Nelligan claims this finding was clearly erroneous. Because the record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12696 - 2017-09-21
test. Nelligan claims this finding was clearly erroneous. Because the record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12696 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jill L. Schwenkhoff v. Ronald O. Schwenkhoff
exercised its discretion in setting child support because the record does not support the income figure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7915 - 2017-09-19
exercised its discretion in setting child support because the record does not support the income figure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7915 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supplemental reports but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417740 - 2021-09-01
supplemental reports but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417740 - 2021-09-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158171 - 2017-09-21
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158171 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William J. Perry
the trial court of additional, accurate information about Perry's criminal record. Therefore, we affirm.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9732 - 2017-09-19
the trial court of additional, accurate information about Perry's criminal record. Therefore, we affirm.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9732 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
No. 2012AP1128-CR 2 motion to dismiss the complaint.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102475 - 2017-09-21
No. 2012AP1128-CR 2 motion to dismiss the complaint.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102475 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is required to pay to her former spouse, Kim Bangart. 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138320 - 2017-09-21
is required to pay to her former spouse, Kim Bangart. 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138320 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel E. La Fave
. Because the record supports the trial court's findings of fact and those findings defeat LaFave's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8695 - 2005-03-31
. Because the record supports the trial court's findings of fact and those findings defeat LaFave's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8695 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241344 - 2019-05-29
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241344 - 2019-05-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-merit report, which we denied. Upon our independent review of the record and having considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209221 - 2018-03-07
no-merit report, which we denied. Upon our independent review of the record and having considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209221 - 2018-03-07