Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22881 - 22890 of 98406 for court records search online.
Search results 22881 - 22890 of 98406 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 10, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137005 - 2015-03-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 10, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137005 - 2015-03-09
COURT OF APPEALS
?” The jury responded, “Yes, it is,” to which the court replied, “Let the record reflect the jury has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82149 - 2012-05-08
?” The jury responded, “Yes, it is,” to which the court replied, “Let the record reflect the jury has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82149 - 2012-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
failed to consider the proper sentencing factors. Indeed, the record reflects that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94485 - 2013-03-25
failed to consider the proper sentencing factors. Indeed, the record reflects that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94485 - 2013-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 31, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92269 - 2013-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 31, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92269 - 2013-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
of the tract because the record did not show the dimensions of the area occupied. The court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35980 - 2009-03-25
of the tract because the record did not show the dimensions of the area occupied. The court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35980 - 2009-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
portions of the record, including the earlier decisions of the trial and appellate courts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29130 - 2007-06-26
portions of the record, including the earlier decisions of the trial and appellate courts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29130 - 2007-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
a self-defense jury instruction. Even if that were not the case, the record reveals that the court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33718 - 2008-08-11
a self-defense jury instruction. Even if that were not the case, the record reveals that the court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33718 - 2008-08-11
COURT OF APPEALS
the jury’s verdict. We will not upset the circuit court’s determination, because the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97145 - 2013-05-22
the jury’s verdict. We will not upset the circuit court’s determination, because the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97145 - 2013-05-22
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 5, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84491 - 2012-07-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 5, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84491 - 2012-07-04
COURT OF APPEALS
of record, we affirm the trial court’s order denying a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.[3] ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36404 - 2009-05-12
of record, we affirm the trial court’s order denying a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.[3] ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36404 - 2009-05-12