Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22881 - 22890 of 29713 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous but reviews de novo whether those facts satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679069 - 2023-07-19

COURT OF APPEALS
principles to those facts de novo. Id., ¶¶14-15 (citations and quotation marks omitted). ¶21 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104307 - 2013-11-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
presents questions of law that this court decides de novo. State v. Arberry, 2018 WI 7, ¶14, ___ Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207787 - 2018-02-01

[PDF] Tony D. Walker v. Gary R. McCaughtry
de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis. 2d 393, 617 N.W.2d 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2640 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 117
not make a sufficient showing on one, see Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697, and we decide de novo the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102930 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(1978). Whether the State has violated the discovery statute presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102446 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Rosella F. Doll v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
a question of statutory interpretation, a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13226 - 2017-09-21

Nancy Johnson Carrick v. Lawrence L. Foster
. Although we review the trial court’s decision de novo, we apply the same standard and methodology employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11096 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id., ¶21. ¶12 Where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446743 - 2021-11-03

[PDF] NOTICE
of a criminal complaint is a matter of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 73-74. ¶16 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59567 - 2014-09-15