Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22881 - 22890 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 22881 - 22890 of 58458 for speedy trial.
CA Blank Order
. Following a jury trial, he was convicted of one count of robbery as a party to the crime, eight counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91386 - 2013-01-06
. Following a jury trial, he was convicted of one count of robbery as a party to the crime, eight counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91386 - 2013-01-06
Ford Consumer Finance Company, Inc. v. Eric K. Graf
material facts were in dispute and whether the trial court properly refused to consider Graf’s untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2132 - 2005-03-31
material facts were in dispute and whether the trial court properly refused to consider Graf’s untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2132 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael Modrow
are subject to a number of conditions that are generally left to the trial court's discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10220 - 2017-09-20
are subject to a number of conditions that are generally left to the trial court's discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10220 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Joseph P. Buchholz
. § 961.41(1m)(h)1 (1999-2000). 1 The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4161 - 2017-09-20
. § 961.41(1m)(h)1 (1999-2000). 1 The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4161 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Modrow
are subject to a number of conditions that are generally left to the trial court's discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10203 - 2017-09-20
are subject to a number of conditions that are generally left to the trial court's discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10203 - 2017-09-20
Nadine M. Butler v. Robert A. Butler
PER CURIAM. Nadine Butler appeals a divorce judgment. She argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4136 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. Nadine Butler appeals a divorce judgment. She argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4136 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erroneously struck a prospective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52535 - 2010-07-26
argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erroneously struck a prospective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52535 - 2010-07-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a trial on the matter; however, Humphrey did not appear at the trial, which was held to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191676 - 2017-09-21
a trial on the matter; however, Humphrey did not appear at the trial, which was held to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191676 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Marathon County v. Daniel J. Hart
the court’s default judgment against him. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5113 - 2017-09-19
the court’s default judgment against him. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5113 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Suzanne M. Dee v. Harold E. Dee
Harold argues that the trial court erred when it awarded Suzanne 65% of the marital assets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10888 - 2017-09-20
Harold argues that the trial court erred when it awarded Suzanne 65% of the marital assets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10888 - 2017-09-20