Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2291 - 2300 of 45121 for Cost-effective.
Search results 2291 - 2300 of 45121 for Cost-effective.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, and the full costs of the proceeding, which are $802.19 as of April 12, 2018, should be assessed against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214323 - 2018-06-15
, and the full costs of the proceeding, which are $802.19 as of April 12, 2018, should be assessed against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214323 - 2018-06-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this appeal is not frivolous and therefore deny Audrey’s motion for costs and fees under WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446954 - 2021-10-28
that this appeal is not frivolous and therefore deny Audrey’s motion for costs and fees under WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446954 - 2021-10-28
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment, entered after a court trial, awarding his ex-girlfriend, Leslie Meganck, $1885.59 plus costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69369 - 2011-08-08
a judgment, entered after a court trial, awarding his ex-girlfriend, Leslie Meganck, $1885.59 plus costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69369 - 2011-08-08
[PDF]
Wiederholt Excavating & Trench v. William Probst
to install a sewer ($1,526), plus pre-judgment interest and costs ($1,534.40), for a total of $3,060.40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14154 - 2014-09-15
to install a sewer ($1,526), plus pre-judgment interest and costs ($1,534.40), for a total of $3,060.40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14154 - 2014-09-15
Wiederholt Excavating & Trench v. William Probst
was for the balance due on a contract to install a sewer ($1,526), plus pre-judgment interest and costs ($1,534.40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14154 - 2005-03-31
was for the balance due on a contract to install a sewer ($1,526), plus pre-judgment interest and costs ($1,534.40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14154 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Lynn Morrissey
Morrissey should pay the costs of this proceeding. ¶3 Attorney Morrissey was admitted to practice law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16836 - 2017-09-21
Morrissey should pay the costs of this proceeding. ¶3 Attorney Morrissey was admitted to practice law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16836 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Steven M. Lucareli v. Vilas County
and Candice Lucareli appeal orders awarding Jack Smith costs and attorney fees based on the Lucarelis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13746 - 2014-09-15
and Candice Lucareli appeal orders awarding Jack Smith costs and attorney fees based on the Lucarelis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13746 - 2014-09-15
State v. James A. Torpen
of probation the payment of special prosecutor’s fees not allowed under the costs statute, Wis. Stat. § 973.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3520 - 2005-03-31
of probation the payment of special prosecutor’s fees not allowed under the costs statute, Wis. Stat. § 973.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3520 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James A. Torpen
of probation the payment of special prosecutor’s fees not allowed under the costs statute, WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3520 - 2017-09-19
of probation the payment of special prosecutor’s fees not allowed under the costs statute, WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3520 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Lynn E. Morrissey
that Attorney Morrissey be ordered to pay the costs No. 2005AP255-D 2 of the disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20715 - 2017-09-21
that Attorney Morrissey be ordered to pay the costs No. 2005AP255-D 2 of the disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20715 - 2017-09-21