Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22901 - 22910 of 57333 for id.
Search results 22901 - 22910 of 57333 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
with information that the officer could have easily and immediately obtained from another source. Id. at 542
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66242 - 2011-06-21
with information that the officer could have easily and immediately obtained from another source. Id. at 542
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66242 - 2011-06-21
2007 WI APP 246
is ordinarily at an end. Id. When statutory language is ambiguous, however, we may consult “extrinsic sources
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30511 - 2007-11-27
is ordinarily at an end. Id. When statutory language is ambiguous, however, we may consult “extrinsic sources
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30511 - 2007-11-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or specially-defined words or phrases are given their technical or special definitional meaning.” Id. “[T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631423 - 2023-03-14
or specially-defined words or phrases are given their technical or special definitional meaning.” Id. “[T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631423 - 2023-03-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. We also review de novo a trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32630 - 2014-09-15
, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. We also review de novo a trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32630 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
here, Agnello held that the issue was preserved by Agnello’s lawyer’s objection. Id., 226 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92203 - 2013-01-28
here, Agnello held that the issue was preserved by Agnello’s lawyer’s objection. Id., 226 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92203 - 2013-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
witnesses to testify to their opinions of the defendant’s character for truthfulness. Id. at 140-41
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35696 - 2009-03-02
witnesses to testify to their opinions of the defendant’s character for truthfulness. Id. at 140-41
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35696 - 2009-03-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that a reasonable judge could reach,” we affirm. Id. ¶8 As Mercedes concedes, “the court has the power to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91620 - 2014-09-15
that a reasonable judge could reach,” we affirm. Id. ¶8 As Mercedes concedes, “the court has the power to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91620 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unreasonable.” Id., ¶20. Consent to search, however, is a well-established exception to the warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87090 - 2014-09-15
unreasonable.” Id., ¶20. Consent to search, however, is a well-established exception to the warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87090 - 2014-09-15
State v. Bruce L. Carson
tests to administer as its primary test. See id. at 269-70. However, once a suspect consents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4451 - 2005-03-31
tests to administer as its primary test. See id. at 269-70. However, once a suspect consents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4451 - 2005-03-31
State v. Aaron O. Schreiber
that the record contains an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis for the sentence. Id. at 661. ¶10 Schreiber
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4049 - 2005-03-31
that the record contains an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis for the sentence. Id. at 661. ¶10 Schreiber
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4049 - 2005-03-31