Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22911 - 22920 of 98543 for civil court case status online.
Search results 22911 - 22920 of 98543 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 27, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245528 - 2019-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 27, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245528 - 2019-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 19, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104498 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 19, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104498 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this court should remand the case for further proceedings on her claim related to oversight of her parents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027802 - 2025-10-23
this court should remand the case for further proceedings on her claim related to oversight of her parents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027802 - 2025-10-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1996) (concluding that the circuit court had inherent authority to dismiss the case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260478 - 2020-05-19
. 1996) (concluding that the circuit court had inherent authority to dismiss the case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260478 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Initial Brief of Democratic Senator Respondents
, Respondents, FILED 10-16-2023 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 Initial Brief
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1016initialbriefdemocraticsenators.pdf - 2023-10-16
, Respondents, FILED 10-16-2023 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 Initial Brief
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1016initialbriefdemocraticsenators.pdf - 2023-10-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 6, 2026 Samuel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058573 - 2026-01-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 6, 2026 Samuel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058573 - 2026-01-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and prejudice prongs of an ineffective-assistance case independently of the trial court, the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104993 - 2017-09-21
and prejudice prongs of an ineffective-assistance case independently of the trial court, the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104993 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), Potocnik argues that in “the cases where the courts have found it constitutionally permissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257980 - 2020-04-14
), Potocnik argues that in “the cases where the courts have found it constitutionally permissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257980 - 2020-04-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. If the parent is found to be unfit, the case proceeds to the dispositional phase, during which the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231979 - 2019-01-17
. If the parent is found to be unfit, the case proceeds to the dispositional phase, during which the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231979 - 2019-01-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” in the case. The court determined that the probative value of the evidence was not substantially outweighed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99899 - 2017-09-21
” in the case. The court determined that the probative value of the evidence was not substantially outweighed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99899 - 2017-09-21