Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22911 - 22920 of 64166 for records.
Search results 22911 - 22920 of 64166 for records.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2024AP1814-CR 2 and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2024AP1814-CR 2 and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
CA Blank Order
a response, but has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147197 - 2015-08-23
a response, but has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147197 - 2015-08-23
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2024AP1814-CR 2 and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050945 - 2025-12-17
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2024AP1814-CR 2 and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050945 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
State v. Roger L. Kaufman
things, the defendant’s criminal record; history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11632 - 2017-09-19
things, the defendant’s criminal record; history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11632 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254345 - 2020-02-18
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254345 - 2020-02-18
State v. John E. Triplett
of an Alford plea.[1] On appeal, Triplett seeks to withdraw his plea based on his claim that the record before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12544 - 2005-03-31
of an Alford plea.[1] On appeal, Triplett seeks to withdraw his plea based on his claim that the record before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12544 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on an independent review of the record and the no-merit report, this court concludes that there are no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707827 - 2023-09-26
on an independent review of the record and the no-merit report, this court concludes that there are no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707827 - 2023-09-26
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was not ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
was not ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
State v. Joseph M. Westcott
, the record should reveal that the sentencing court did in fact consider appropriate factors. See Macemon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12076 - 2005-03-31
, the record should reveal that the sentencing court did in fact consider appropriate factors. See Macemon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12076 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2025AP531 2 and the record, this court concludes that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054282 - 2025-12-23
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2025AP531 2 and the record, this court concludes that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054282 - 2025-12-23