Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22911 - 22920 of 63609 for records/1000.
Search results 22911 - 22920 of 63609 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment record consists largely of the report of Pauli’s expert and a few select pages from deposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146338 - 2015-08-18
judgment record consists largely of the report of Pauli’s expert and a few select pages from deposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146338 - 2015-08-18
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Sussek
at 847-48. Our independent review of the record satisfies us that counsel’s decision to emphasize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13265 - 2017-09-21
at 847-48. Our independent review of the record satisfies us that counsel’s decision to emphasize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13265 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appearing in the record and in reliance on the appropriate and applicable law.” Id. (omission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996551 - 2025-08-14
appearing in the record and in reliance on the appropriate and applicable law.” Id. (omission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996551 - 2025-08-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of recorded statements for publication at trial. The notice listed an intent to put copies of recordings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992742 - 2025-08-05
of recorded statements for publication at trial. The notice listed an intent to put copies of recordings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992742 - 2025-08-05
[PDF]
Frontsheet
from the record whether Attorney Booker received notice No. 2013AP505-D 5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133077 - 2017-09-21
from the record whether Attorney Booker received notice No. 2013AP505-D 5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133077 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
order, statements by a confidential informant, an unconstitutional video-recorded search of Summers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256259 - 2020-03-12
order, statements by a confidential informant, an unconstitutional video-recorded search of Summers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256259 - 2020-03-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“the Court’s desire that there be something on the record” but asked the court to reconsider, noting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644939 - 2023-04-19
“the Court’s desire that there be something on the record” but asked the court to reconsider, noting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644939 - 2023-04-19
Raymond Booker v. David Schwarz
was delayed because of constraints related to transferring records from the criminal attorney to the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6089 - 2005-03-31
was delayed because of constraints related to transferring records from the criminal attorney to the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6089 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627544 - 2023-02-28
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627544 - 2023-02-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decision] … and there must be support for that reasoning in the record.”). ¶13 Charlene contends we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212597 - 2018-05-10
decision] … and there must be support for that reasoning in the record.”). ¶13 Charlene contends we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212597 - 2018-05-10